Movement Load Captures the Real Neuromuscular Demands in Ice Hockey — Far Better Than Skating Distance

Joel WenningJoel Wenning, Customer Success Manager, Firstbeat

Sports Coaching

In ice hockey, tracking player load is essential for optimizing performance and preventing injury. Traditionally, one commonly used metric is skating distance—the total meters/feet (or kilometers/miles) a player skates during a game or practice. But while useful, skating distance alone doesn’t fully capture the neuromuscular load—the real stress placed on muscles and nervous system.

That’s where Movement Load — a core metric in the Firstbeat Sports platform — comes in. Built on data from 3-dimensional accelerometers embedded in the Firstbeat Sports Sensor, Movement Load quantifies every movement across all planes of motion. It gives coaches a single number that reflects the external training load an athlete has accumulated over a session, providing valuable context to internal physiology data (like TRIMP, Training Effect, and heart rate responses) that Firstbeat has long been known for. Movement Load offers a more holistic picture. It integrates acceleration, deceleration, changes of direction and high-intensity efforts. This blog post explains why Movement Load better describes neuromuscular demand, with graphs to illustrate the case.

Why Skating Distance Falls Short in Ice Hockey

Skating distance has long been a go-to metric for teams tracking volume in hockey. But hockey isn’t a continuous endurance sport — it’s a series of short, high-intensity bursts, rapid changes of direction, stops and starts, and frequent contact situations. These kinds of movements place neuromuscular demand on the body that distance alone simply cannot describe.

Distance metrics measure how much distance the athlete has covered — but not how hard or how intensely they moved.  Especially in ice hockey it’s easy to cover a lot of distance without just by gliding on the ice and without doing much. Two players might both skate 4.8 km in a game, yet one could accumulate a much higher neuromuscular stress simply by performing more high-intensity accelerations, decelerations and rapid changes of direction — changes the accelerometer-based Movement Load captures, and that simple distance does not.

Movement Load: A More Complete Picture of External Load

Movement Load quantifies the sum of an athlete’s movements across all three axes using high-resolution accelerometer data. The result is a figure that grows with every intensity-driven action, not just the total distance covered.

Movement Load is captured in all 3 planes of motion with 50Hz.

Here’s why that matters:

  • It accounts for explosiveness: Short bursts to support a teammate to win a board battle accumulate significant neuromuscular load — even if they don’t add many meters on the clock.
  • It reflects direction changes: Rapid pivoting, crossovers, and stops are core features of hockey — and contribute heavily to neuromuscular stress.
  • It captures context: By layering Movement Load with internal load (heart rate, TRIMP), coaches can see why a player shows a given physiological response. Was it distance? Or intensity of movement?

Movement Load Aligns Better With How Players Feel

Coaches often collect RPE (Rate of Perceived Exertion) after games and practices to gauge how demanding a session felt for an athlete. When you compare RPE against the metrics:

  • Skating distance shows a weak relationship to RPE, since it doesn’t differentiate between easy cruising and intense efforts.
  • Movement Load aligns much more strongly with RPE, reflecting how neuromuscular and metabolic stress accumulate during play.

This is no surprise to sport scientists — perceived exertion is influenced by both physiological strain and mechanical work, neither of which are adequately captured by distance metrics alone.

What This Means for Ice Hockey Coaches

Using Movement Load alongside traditional internal metrics like TRIMP provides a more holistic view of an athlete’s session. By understanding how Movement Load interacts with internal training responses:

  • Coaches can spot when a player is under- or over-performing relative to their expected neuromuscular output.
  • Movement Load can help tailor recovery or training interventions, since it describes the actual physical work the athlete endured.
  • Over time, tracking Movement Load alongside internal responses can reveal trends in fitness, efficiency and readiness — without the need for frequent laboratory testing.

Conclusion: Movement Load Adds the Missing Piece

In a sport driven by discrete, high-effort actions, Movement Load offers a richer, more actionable insight into the physical demands placed on ice hockey players than Skating distance.

By integrating accelerometer-based Movement Load with Firstbeat’s internal load measures, coaches gain a powerful tool for understanding performance, managing training load, and ultimately helping athletes perform at their best with reduced risk of injury.

 

Helpful? Or not? Happy to continue discussions with you! Book a meeting with me using this link.

Joel Wenning Joel Wenning, Customer Success Manager, Firstbeat

Joel Wenning is a Customer Success Manager at Firstbeat. He is a certified exercise physiologist, and one of our most experienced CSMs at Firstbeat, having supported elite and professional sport organisations from the top leagues like NHL, NFL, NBA, MLS and PL for 4 years now. He works with clients across the globe, helping teams translate physiological training-load data into practical decisions. Joel’s depth of experience across Firstbeat, physiology, and high-performance sport will make him a valuable asset to any performance staff.

You might also be interested in